Tag: Canada

  • Canadian biofuel plans derailed

    Canadian biofuel plans derailed

    Iogen cancels a pioneering facility to turn crop waste into ethanol.

    A leading biofuels company whose products have powered Formula 1 racing cars has hit a major bump in the road.

    Canadian company Iogen Energy in Ottawa announced on 30 April that it has shelved plans to build a large-scale facility in Manitoba to produce fuel ethanol from cellulose, the long molecular chain of sugars that forms the fibrous material in plants.

    Instead, the company will “refocus its strategy and activities”, leading to a smaller development programme and the loss of 150 jobs, its joint owners Royal Dutch Shell and Iogen Corporation said in a statement. Iogen Corporation would not comment further on the story and Shell did not respond to Nature‘s questions.

    In the past decade, growing concerns about climate change, rising energy consumption and dependence on foreign oil  have prompted countries and companies to invest in biofuel production.

    Most fuel ethanol is made by fermenting the sugars in grains or sugar cane, but cellulosic ethanol can be made from municipal waste, wood chips, grass, and the stalks, leaves and stems of food crops. It is seen as a more sustainable biofuel because it does not divert food from dinner tables to biorefineries. But cracking apart the tough cellulose molecules is a lot harder than brewing up simple sugars.

    Cracking stuff

    Iogen opened the world’s first demonstration plant for producing cellulosic ethanol in Ottawa in 2004. Its process uses enzymes to break down the cellulose in wheat, oat and barley straw to glucose, which is then converted to ethanol.

    Although the plant’s production capacity is nearly 2 million litres per year, its output peaked at just 581,042 litres in 2009. In 2008, Iogen suspended plans to build a commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol facility in Iowa, and in 2011 it decided not to set up a plant in central Saskatchewan.

    “This shouldn’t be seen as a black mark on the industry,” says Scott Thurlow, president of the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association. “There is still lots of opportunity in Canada.”

    Keep reading this story in Nature.

    Image from jayneandd on Flickr

  • Frozen Assets

    Frozen Assets

    Maclean’s

    Ice cores tell the history of Canada’s climate, but now the government doesn’t want them anymore. (more…)

  • Canada’s ice cores seek new home

    Confusion over fate of valuable climate record chills researchers.

    An unusual ‘help wanted’ advertisement arrived in the inboxes of Canadian scientists last week. The e-mail asked the research community to provide new homes for an impressive archive of ice cores representing 40 years of research by government scientists in the Canadian Arctic.

    The note was sent out by Christian Zdanowicz, a glaciologist at the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) in Ottawa. He claimed that the collection faced destruction owing to budget cuts at Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), the government department that runs the survey, and a “radical downsizing” of the Ice Core Research Laboratory. The e-mail pressed scientists at universities and other institutions to take in the ice cores before they were left to melt.

    But David Scott, director of the GSC’s northern Canada division, denies this and says that there have been no budget cuts at GSC. He says that GSC management did not approve the letter, and it contains a number of factual errors. “There is no shutdown of the ice-core facility being contemplated. We’re not actively dispersing the collection,” he says. “Nothing that meets the criterion of having scientific value would be destroyed.”

    >> Continue reading at Nature.com

    This story was posted on ScientificAmerican.com, and mentioned on Mother Jones‘ Blue Marble blog

     

     

     

     

     

  • Despite Canadian government woes, neuroscience should win out

    Despite Canadian government woes, neuroscience should win out

    MONTREAL — When Canada’s Conservative government presented its 2011 budget in late March, the fiscal plan didn’t contain too many surprises for science funding. Like previous budgets, the proposal offered modest increases to the country’s national research agencies and replenished the coffers of Genome Canada, its genomics and proteomics outfit. But the budget also contained a flashy and unprecedented new move: a multimillion-dollar earmark for neuroscience research.

    Under the Conservatives’ proposed scheme, the government would contribute up to C$100 million ($105 million) over several years to the Canada Brain Research Fund, a public-private partnership led by the Brain Canada Foundation in collaboration with the Canadian Association for Neuroscience and Neurological Health Charities Canada (NHCC). The government money would then be matched by funds raised from private sources by Brain Canada to support large, multidisciplinary neuroscience grants, postdoctoral fellowships and training programs.

    Read the full story at Nature Medicine(subscription required). Published online 5 May 2011.

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan of a head. Released under the GFDL by en:User:TheBrain on 20 May 2003.

  • Taxonomy in Trouble in Canada

    Taxonomy in Trouble in Canada

    Canada is at risk of losing its taxonomic expertise, according to a report released today.

    The report details stagnant research funding, greying experts, a lag in digitization and a lack of support for national collections. This is threatening Canada’s understanding of its biodiversity, and the ecosystem services it provides, the report concludes.

    “Canadian contributions to describing new species has dropped from being 6th in the world to 14th in the last decade,” says Thomas Lovejoy, Biodiversity Chair at the Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, who chaired the panel of 14 Canadian and international experts who authored the report. “The taxonomic expertise in Canada is slipping at the moment when it needs to surge forward.”

    The effects are already being felt. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada recently filled positions on its subcommittees with outside experts because not enough Canadians had expertise in several taxonomic groups, including terrestrial and freshwater molluscs, lichens and mosses, the report says.

    Canada has more than 50 million wildlife specimens in collections worth over CDN$250 million, but there is no strategy for their maintenance, says David Green, director of the Redpath Museum at McGill University in Montreal. There are few storage facilities with advanced climate and pest control systems, and many are bulging beyond capacity.

    The story continues on Nature’s blog The Great Beyond.